lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1260910330-3409-1-git-send-email-jdm64@gawab.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:52:10 -0800
From:	Justin Madru <jdm64@...ab.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Justin Madru <jdm64@...ab.com>, gregkh@...e.de, error27@...il.com,
	ray-lk@...rabbit.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: s5k3e2fx.c: simplify complexity by factoring

the code was looping, seting s_move[i] to the following calculations

if (actual_step >= 0)
        s_move[i] = ((((i + 1) * gain + 0x200) - (i * gain + 0x200)) / 0x400);
else
        s_move[i] = ((((i + 1) * gain - 0x200) - (i * gain - 0x200)) / 0x400);

but, this code redues to the expression
	s_move[i] = gain >> 10;

The reason for the complexity was to generate a step function with
integer division and rounding to land on specific values. But these calculations
can be simplified to the following code:

	gain = ((actual_step << 10) / 5) >> 10;
	for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++)
		s_move[i] = gain;
---
 drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c |   10 +++-------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c b/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c
index edba198..66582af 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dream/camera/s5k3e2fx.c
@@ -1093,14 +1093,10 @@ static int32_t s5k3e2fx_move_focus(int direction, int32_t num_steps)
 
 	actual_step = step_direction * (int16_t)num_steps;
 	pos_offset = init_code + s5k3e2fx_ctrl->curr_lens_pos;
-	gain = actual_step * 0x400 / 5;
+	gain = ((actual_step << 10) / 5) >> 10;
 
-	for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++) {
-		if (actual_step >= 0)
-			s_move[i] = ((((i+1)*gain+0x200) - (i*gain+0x200))/0x400);
-		else
-			s_move[i] = ((((i+1)*gain-0x200) - (i*gain-0x200))/0x400);
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++)
+		s_move[i] = gain;
 
 	/* Ring Damping Code */
 	for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++) {
-- 
1.6.5.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ