[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091215022020.GD21796@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:20:20 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf symbols: Allow lookups by symbol name
too
Em Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:12:03AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 07:22:03AM +0000, tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Looking over the vmlinux/kallsyms is common enough that I'll add a
> > variable to the upcoming struct perf_session to avoid the need to
> > use map_groups__find_by_name to get the main vmlinux/kallsyms map.
> >
> > The above example looks on the 'variable' symtab, but it is just
> > like that for the functions one.
> >
> > Also the sort operation is done when we first use
> > map__find_symbol_by_name, in a lazy way.
>
> It would be nice to also have a kernel symbol resolution
> helper independant of any session.
>
> The problem is that I need to resolve a kernel variable symbol
> very early, when we parse record options. We don't have any
> session at this time so I can't retrieve the kmaps.
Humm, I don't think that is a problem, we just have to create the
session before processing the args, after all at record time we can use
kallsyms already.
> I'm not sure what's the proper way to handle that.
What is the problem? I'm not following :-)
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists