[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091215133808.cd3d4b8b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:38:08 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...ia.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the voltage tree with Linus' tree
Hi Liam,
Today's linux-next merge of the voltage tree got a conflict in
drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c between commit
441a450554dada1c59fc06fdf068cb0eeba53c6d ("regulator: Add support for
twl6030 regulators") from Linus' tree and commits
6360cf42ae51be5f6e6e72d6e81f202d9db0f7e9 ("twl4030-regulator: Remove
regulator from all groups when disabling") and
3277b9fce0fcaa68d5947429e062163852ebc6fb ("twl4030-regulator: Add all TWL
regulators to twreg_info") from the voltage tree.
I cannot begin to fix this mess up. I do wonder why the regulator patch
above was never in linux-next before being sent upstream yesterday
(Samuel?). All I can do is use the version of the voltage tree from
next-20091120 (commit id b0a7a2ad0aebb35934de6d2509c73fe93a362c0e) for
today and hope that Liam can do the merge with Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists