[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912160911.43201.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:11:42 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:33:50 pm Tejun Heo wrote:
> (Rusty Russell cc'd.)
>
> On 12/15/2009 07:03 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > @@ -479,15 +467,15 @@ static inline int try_module_get(struct
> > int ret = 1;
> >
> > if (module) {
> > - unsigned int cpu = get_cpu();
> > if (likely(module_is_live(module))) {
> > - local_inc(__module_ref_addr(module, cpu));
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + __this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->count);
> > trace_module_get(module, _THIS_IP_,
> > - local_read(__module_ref_addr(module, cpu)));
> > + __this_cpu_read(module->refptr->count));
> > + preempt_enable();
> > }
> > else
> > ret = 0;
> > - put_cpu();
>
> I think you need preemption disabled while checking whether
> module_is_live(). The state is protected by stop_machine or
> synchronize_sched().
Yes.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists