[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B26FC52.6060307@billgatliff.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:02:42 -0600
From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
To: Aras Vaichas <arasv@...ellan-technology.com>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>, cbou@...l.ru,
dwmw2@...radead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
lenz@...wisc.edu, Dirk@...er-online.de, arminlitzel@....de,
Cyril Hrubis <metan@....cz>, thommycheck@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dbaryshkov@...il.com, omegamoon@...il.com, eric.y.miao@...il.com,
utx@...guin.cz, zaurus-devel@...ts.linuxtogo.org
Subject: Re: [POWER] battery calibration parameters from sysfs
Aras Vaichas wrote:
> Unfortunately the simple coulomb counting chips have the disadvantage
> that the CPU has to be running to accumulate the pulses. Of course,
> the pulses could wake the CPU from a suspend mode, but I'd rather not
> do that just to add "one" to a counter ...
>
Could you have the coulomb-counting chip connected to a tiny
microcontroller, or even a dedicated hardware counter? Then the main
CPU wouldn't need to wake as often, it could just ask the
microcontroller over I2C, or read/reset the hardware counter.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@...lgatliff.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists