[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B288413.2070704@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:24:11 +0530
From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>
To: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
CC: Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [Next] CPU Hotplug test failures on powerpc
Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>>
>>> Does this testcase hotplug cpu 0 off?
>>>
>>>
>> No, i don't think so. It skips cpu0 during online/offline
>> process.
>>
>
> Then how could this happen ? Looks like cpu 0 is offline ....
> 0:mon> <4>IRQ 17 affinity broken off cpu 0
> <4>IRQ 18 affinity broken off cpu 0
> <4>IRQ 19 affinity broken off cpu 0
> <4>IRQ 264 affinity broken off cpu 0
> <4>cpu 0 (hwid 0) Ready to die...
> <7>clockevent: decrementer mult[83126e97] shift[32] cpu[0]
>
Sorry i was looking at only one script. Looking more closely
at the test there are 6 different sub tests. The rest of the
tests do seem to hotplug CPU 0.
Thanks
-Sachin
--
---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists