[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B288F04.5080108@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:40:52 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf_event: introduce 'perf timer' to analyze timer's
behavior
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>> Yeah, it has different unit and looks ugly :-(
>>
>> but, the problem is we can't get HZ in userspace now, i'll export HZ by proc
>> or other way and rectify 'perf timer' output in my next work
>
> We could export HZ as part of the ftrace event format file, in
> /debug/tracing/events/timers/ or so. Not sure what the best way would be to do
> it (without causing runtime overhead in event processing), but we should
> reduce our reliance on /proc and export such instrumentation information via a
> single, coherent interface.
>
Hi ingo,
Um, if we export this value in tracepoint format, it should add for every timer's
tracepoint.
> There's a couple of other 'system settings' values that would be useful to
> expose in such a way - for example the number of online CPUs. (in fact that
> could be exposed as a set of online/offline events plus a way to read the
> current count as well)
>
How about export those values in debugfs/tracing/*? perf tracepoint self depend on
this filesystem.
Thanks,
Xiao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists