[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091216101107.GA15031@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:11:07 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, andi@...stfloor.org,
minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: [mm][RFC][PATCH 0/11] mm accessor updates.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:00:11PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> This is from Christoph Lameter's mm_accessor patch posted 5/Nov.
>
> Replacing all access to mm->mmap_sem with mm-accessor functions as
> mm_read_lock,
> mm_write_lock,
> etc...
>
> This kind of function allows us to improve page fault performance etc..
> For example, skil down_read(mmap_sem) in some situation.
> (as: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=125809791306459&w=2)
The problem is that it also slows down the writers, and we have
some workloads where writing is the bottleneck.
I don't think this is the right trade off at this time.
Also the patches didn't fare too well in testing unfortunately.
I suspect we'll rather need multiple locks split per address
space range.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists