| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091216231625.GD27228@liondog.tnic>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:16:25 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] x86 msrs: alloc/free for CONFIG_SMP=n
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:41:13PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> My preference would be to move the SMP-specific functions to a new
> file, call it msr-smp.c, and then leave only the functions that should
> be included unconditionally in msr.c (I believe it is cleaner to do it
> that way than the opposite.)
v2:
---
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:49:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86, msr: fix CONFIG_SMP=n build
Randy Dunlap reported the following build error:
"When CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_X86_MSR=m:
ERROR: "msrs_free" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "msrs_alloc" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!"
This is due to the fact that <arch/x86/lib/msr.c> is conditioned on
CONFIG_SMP and in the UP case we have only the stubs in the header.
Fork off SMP functionality into a new file (msr-smp.c) and build
msrs_{alloc,free} unconditionally.
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 12 +++
arch/x86/lib/Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/lib/msr.c | 213 --------------------------------------------
4 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 2d228fc..a0157f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -27,6 +27,18 @@ struct msr {
};
};
+struct msr_info {
+ u32 msr_no;
+ struct msr reg;
+ struct msr *msrs;
+ int err;
+};
+
+struct msr_regs_info {
+ u32 *regs;
+ int err;
+};
+
static inline unsigned long long native_read_tscp(unsigned int *aux)
{
unsigned long low, high;
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
index 45b20e4..cffd754 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ $(obj)/inat.o: $(obj)/inat-tables.c
clean-files := inat-tables.c
-obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) := msr.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += msr-smp.o
lib-y := delay.o
lib-y += thunk_$(BITS).o
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ lib-y += usercopy_$(BITS).o getuser.o putuser.o
lib-y += memcpy_$(BITS).o
lib-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += insn.o inat.o
-obj-y += msr-reg.o msr-reg-export.o
+obj-y += msr.o msr-reg.o msr-reg-export.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_32),y)
obj-y += atomic64_32.o
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6b1b86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <asm/msr.h>
+
+static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+ struct msr *reg;
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (rv->msrs)
+ reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
+ else
+ reg = &rv->reg;
+
+ rdmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+ struct msr *reg;
+ int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
+ if (rv->msrs)
+ reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
+ else
+ reg = &rv->reg;
+
+ wrmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.reg.l;
+ *h = rv.reg.h;
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.l = l;
+ rv.reg.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
+
+static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
+ struct msr *msrs,
+ void (*msr_func) (void *info))
+{
+ struct msr_info rv;
+ int this_cpu;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msrs = msrs;
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+
+ this_cpu = get_cpu();
+
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
+ msr_func(&rv);
+
+ smp_call_function_many(mask, msr_func, &rv, 1);
+ put_cpu();
+}
+
+/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ */
+void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __rdmsr_on_cpu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/*
+ * wrmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ */
+void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __wrmsr_on_cpu);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
+
+/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
+ may not actually exist. */
+static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->reg.l, &rv->reg.h);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->reg.l, rv->reg.h);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ *l = rv.reg.l;
+ *h = rv.reg.h;
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_info rv;
+
+ memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
+
+ rv.msr_no = msr_no;
+ rv.reg.l = l;
+ rv.reg.h = h;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
+
+/*
+ * These variants are significantly slower, but allows control over
+ * the entire 32-bit GPR set.
+ */
+static void __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = rdmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
+}
+
+static void __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
+{
+ struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
+
+ rv->err = wrmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
+}
+
+int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_regs_info rv;
+
+ rv.regs = regs;
+ rv.err = -EIO;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
+
+int wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct msr_regs_info rv;
+
+ rv.regs = regs;
+ rv.err = -EIO;
+ err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+
+ return err ? err : rv.err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
index 8728341..8f8eebd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
@@ -1,123 +1,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
-#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
-struct msr_info {
- u32 msr_no;
- struct msr reg;
- struct msr *msrs;
- int err;
-};
-
-static void __rdmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
- struct msr *reg;
- int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-
- if (rv->msrs)
- reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
- else
- reg = &rv->reg;
-
- rdmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
- struct msr *reg;
- int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
-
- if (rv->msrs)
- reg = per_cpu_ptr(rv->msrs, this_cpu);
- else
- reg = &rv->reg;
-
- wrmsr(rv->msr_no, reg->l, reg->h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.reg.l;
- *h = rv.reg.h;
-
- return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.reg.l = l;
- rv.reg.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
-
-static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
- struct msr *msrs,
- void (*msr_func) (void *info))
-{
- struct msr_info rv;
- int this_cpu;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msrs = msrs;
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
-
- this_cpu = get_cpu();
-
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
- msr_func(&rv);
-
- smp_call_function_many(mask, msr_func, &rv, 1);
- put_cpu();
-}
-
-/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
- *
- * @mask: which CPUs
- * @msr_no: which MSR
- * @msrs: array of MSR values
- *
- */
-void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
-{
- __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __rdmsr_on_cpu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
-
-/*
- * wrmsr on a bunch of CPUs
- *
- * @mask: which CPUs
- * @msr_no: which MSR
- * @msrs: array of MSR values
- *
- */
-void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
-{
- __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __wrmsr_on_cpu);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
-
struct msr *msrs_alloc(void)
{
struct msr *msrs = NULL;
@@ -137,100 +21,3 @@ void msrs_free(struct msr *msrs)
free_percpu(msrs);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(msrs_free);
-
-/* These "safe" variants are slower and should be used when the target MSR
- may not actually exist. */
-static void __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = rdmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, &rv->reg.l, &rv->reg.h);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = wrmsr_safe(rv->msr_no, rv->reg.l, rv->reg.h);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- *l = rv.reg.l;
- *h = rv.reg.h;
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_info rv;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
- rv.reg.l = l;
- rv.reg.h = h;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_on_cpu);
-
-/*
- * These variants are significantly slower, but allows control over
- * the entire 32-bit GPR set.
- */
-struct msr_regs_info {
- u32 *regs;
- int err;
-};
-
-static void __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = rdmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
-}
-
-static void __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(void *info)
-{
- struct msr_regs_info *rv = info;
-
- rv->err = wrmsr_safe_regs(rv->regs);
-}
-
-int rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_regs_info rv;
-
- rv.regs = regs;
- rv.err = -EIO;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
-
-int wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 *regs)
-{
- int err;
- struct msr_regs_info rv;
-
- rv.regs = regs;
- rv.err = -EIO;
- err = smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
-
- return err ? err : rv.err;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu);
--
1.6.5
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists