[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adapr6e7ag3.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:42:20 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: kexec reboot broken with ioatdma?
> If its reset in a standard path, then yes that seems sensible to me.
> I'm mainly concerned about avoiding something along the lines of:
>
> if (is_booting_from_kexec)
> reset_hw();
I think we all agree... the idea is to change from
init_hw()
{
/* assume hw is in pristine state */
do_init();
}
to
init_hw()
{
/* hw is in unknown state */
reset_hw();
do_init();
}
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists