lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091217011606.605472719@mini.kroah.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:15:17 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [66/90] sparc64: Fix overly strict range type matching for PCI devices.

2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

[ Upstream commit 4230fa3b89ea1c413766bd411a8315a3d05aa6c7 ]

When we are trying to see if a range property entry applies
to a given address, we are overly strict about the type.

We should only allow I/O ranges for I/O addresses, and only allow
CONFIG space ranges for CONFIG space address.

However for MEM ranges, they come in 32-bit and 64-bit flavors.
And a lack of an exact match is OK if the range is 32-bit and
the address is 64-bit.  We can assign a 64-bit address properly
into a 32-bit parent range just fine.

So allow it.

Reported-by: Patrick Finnegan <pat@...puter-refuge.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/of_device_64.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device_64.c
@@ -104,9 +104,19 @@ static int of_bus_pci_map(u32 *addr, con
 	int i;
 
 	/* Check address type match */
-	if ((addr[0] ^ range[0]) & 0x03000000)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!((addr[0] ^ range[0]) & 0x03000000))
+		goto type_match;
+
+	/* Special exception, we can map a 64-bit address into
+	 * a 32-bit range.
+	 */
+	if ((addr[0] & 0x03000000) == 0x03000000 &&
+	    (range[0] & 0x03000000) == 0x02000000)
+		goto type_match;
+
+	return -EINVAL;
 
+type_match:
 	if (of_out_of_range(addr + 1, range + 1, range + na + pna,
 			    na - 1, ns))
 		return -EINVAL;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ