[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091217011604.354502244@mini.kroah.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:15:00 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [49/90] b44: Fix wedge when using netconsole.
2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[ Upstream commit 0cae200eec6330cd2c20b24279597be1da50dc93 ]
Fixes kernel bugzilla #14691
Due to the way netpoll works, it is perfectly legal to see
NAPI already scheduled when new device events are pending
in b44_interrupt().
So logging a message about it is wrong and in fact harmful.
Based upon a patch by Andreas Mohr.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/net/b44.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/b44.c
+++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
@@ -913,9 +913,6 @@ static irqreturn_t b44_interrupt(int irq
bp->istat = istat;
__b44_disable_ints(bp);
__napi_schedule(&bp->napi);
- } else {
- printk(KERN_ERR PFX "%s: Error, poll already scheduled\n",
- dev->name);
}
irq_ack:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists