[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091217014348.GA684@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:43:48 -0800
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: trivial - reenable Skipped synchronization message once at boot
commit 9b3660a5 changed below
- printk_once(KERN_INFO "Skipping synchronization checks
as TSC is
+ if (cpu == (nr_cpu_ids-1) || system_state !=
SYSTEM_BOOTING)
+ pr_info(
+ "Skipped synchronization checks as TSC is
reliable.\n");
which results in "Skipped synchronization checks as TSC is reliable"
message missing from my dmesg. The problem is that nr_cpu_ids is number
of possible CPUs, and courtesy extra disabled cpus in my bios, that
number is higher than real cpus.
Change the check to num_present_cpus() - 1, which gets us back to old
behavior of printing this message once at boot.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
index 0aa5fed..6fe5184 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
@@ -114,9 +114,11 @@ void __cpuinit check_tsc_sync_source(int cpu)
return;
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE)) {
- if (cpu == (nr_cpu_ids-1) || system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
+ if (cpu == (num_present_cpus() - 1) ||
+ system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING) {
pr_info(
"Skipped synchronization checks as TSC is reliable.\n");
+ }
return;
}
--
1.6.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists