linux-kernel - [060/151] devpts_get_tty() should validate inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091217035650.668559199@mini.kroah.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:55:57 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [060/151] devpts_get_tty() should validate inode

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit edfacdd6f81119b9005615593f2cbd94b8c7e2d8 upstream.

devpts_get_tty() assumes that the inode passed in is associated with a valid
pty.  But if the only reference to the pty is via a bind-mount, the inode
passed to devpts_get_tty() while valid, would refer to a pty that no longer
exists.

With a lot of debug effort, Grzegorz Nosek developed a small program (see
below) to reproduce a crash on recent kernels. This crash is a regression
introduced by the commit:

	commit 527b3e4773628b30d03323a2cb5fb0d84441990f
	Author: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>
	Date:   Mon Oct 13 10:43:08 2008 +0100

To fix, ensure that the dentry associated with the inode has not yet been
deleted/unhashed by devpts_pty_kill().

See also:
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2009-July/019273.html

tty-bug.c:

#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/signal.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>

#include <linux/fs.h>

void dummy(int sig)
{
}

static int child(void *unused)
{
	int fd;

	signal(SIGINT, dummy); signal(SIGHUP, dummy);
	pause(); /* cheesy synchronisation to wait for /dev/pts/0 to appear */

	mount("/dev/pts/0", "/dev/console", NULL, MS_BIND, NULL);
	sleep(2);

	fd = open("/dev/console", O_RDWR);
	dup(0); dup(0);
	write(1, "Hello world!\n", sizeof("Hello world!\n")-1);
	return 0;
}

int main(void)
{
	pid_t pid;
	char *stack;

	stack = malloc(16384);
	pid = clone(child, stack+16384, CLONE_NEWNS|SIGCHLD, NULL);

	open("/dev/ptmx", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK);

	unlockpt(fd); grantpt(fd);

	sleep(2);
	kill(pid, SIGHUP);
	sleep(1);
	return 0; /* exit before child opens /dev/console */
}

Reported-by: Grzegorz Nosek <root@...aldomain.pl>
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/devpts/inode.c |   16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/devpts/inode.c
+++ b/fs/devpts/inode.c
@@ -517,11 +517,23 @@ int devpts_pty_new(struct inode *ptmx_in
 
 struct tty_struct *devpts_get_tty(struct inode *pts_inode, int number)
 {
+	struct dentry *dentry;
+	struct tty_struct *tty;
+
 	BUG_ON(pts_inode->i_rdev == MKDEV(TTYAUX_MAJOR, PTMX_MINOR));
 
+	/* Ensure dentry has not been deleted by devpts_pty_kill() */
+	dentry = d_find_alias(pts_inode);
+	if (!dentry)
+		return NULL;
+
+	tty = NULL;
 	if (pts_inode->i_sb->s_magic == DEVPTS_SUPER_MAGIC)
-		return (struct tty_struct *)pts_inode->i_private;
-	return NULL;
+		tty = (struct tty_struct *)pts_inode->i_private;
+
+	dput(dentry);
+
+	return tty;
 }
 
 void devpts_pty_kill(struct tty_struct *tty)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/