lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091217035646.187922809@mini.kroah.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:55:22 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	jirislaby@...il.com, rjw@...k.pl, me@...copeland.com,
	david.quan@...eros.com,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: [025/151] ath5k: enable EEPROM checksum check

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com>

commit 512414b0bed0d376ac4d5ec1dd6f0b1a3551febc upstream.

Without this we have no gaurantee of the integrity of the
EEPROM and are likely to encounter a lot of bogus bug reports
due to actual issues on the EEPROM. With the EEPROM checksum
check in place we can easily rule those issues out.

If you run patch during a revert *you* have a card with a busted
EEPROM and only older kernel will support that concoction. This
patch is a trade off between not accepitng bogus EEPROMs and
avoiding bogus bug reports allowing developers to focus instead
on real concrete issues.

If stable keeps bogus bug reports because of a possibly busted EEPROM
feel free to apply this there too.

Tested on an AR5414

Cc: jirislaby@...il.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: rjw@...k.pl
Cc: me@...copeland.com
Cc: david.quan@...eros.com
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/eeprom.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ ath5k_eeprom_init_header(struct ath5k_hw
 	struct ath5k_eeprom_info *ee = &ah->ah_capabilities.cap_eeprom;
 	int ret;
 	u16 val;
+	u32 cksum, offset;
 
 	/*
 	 * Read values from EEPROM and store them in the capability structure
@@ -111,7 +112,6 @@ ath5k_eeprom_init_header(struct ath5k_hw
 	if (ah->ah_ee_version < AR5K_EEPROM_VERSION_3_0)
 		return 0;
 
-#ifdef notyet
 	/*
 	 * Validate the checksum of the EEPROM date. There are some
 	 * devices with invalid EEPROMs.
@@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ ath5k_eeprom_init_header(struct ath5k_hw
 		ATH5K_ERR(ah->ah_sc, "Invalid EEPROM checksum 0x%04x\n", cksum);
 		return -EIO;
 	}
-#endif
 
 	AR5K_EEPROM_READ_HDR(AR5K_EEPROM_ANT_GAIN(ah->ah_ee_version),
 	    ee_ant_gain);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ