linux-kernel - Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200912171612.54117.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:12:53 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:55:13 am Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 12/17/2009 01:10 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Fixup patch:
> > 
> > Subject: Extend preempt_disable section around module_is_live()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
> 
> Looks good to me but as the patch currently isn't any tree, it'll
> probably be better to merge it into the original patch.  Rusty, do you
> want to take this one?  If not, I can route it through percpu tree.

Easiest to go with your stuff I think:

	Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/