[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hfx7aw0za.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:47:37 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
Cc: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] sound/oss/pss: Fix test of unsigned in pss_reset_dsp() and pss_download_boot()
At Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:23:03 -0700,
Troy Kisky wrote:
>
> Roel Kluin wrote:
> > limit and jiffies are unsigned so the test does not work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Found using coccinelle: http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/oss/pss.c b/sound/oss/pss.c
> > index 83f5ee2..9325f4d 100644
> > --- a/sound/oss/pss.c
> > +++ b/sound/oss/pss.c
> > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static int pss_reset_dsp(pss_confdata * devc)
> > unsigned long i, limit = jiffies + HZ/10;
> >
> > outw(0x2000, REG(PSS_CONTROL));
> > - for (i = 0; i < 32768 && (limit-jiffies >= 0); i++)
>
> I think
> for (i = 0; i < 32768 && ( (int)(limit-jiffies) >= 0); i++)
>
> works better when jiffies wrap
Yes, and time_after_eq() takes care of it nicely :)
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists