linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sh: convert to asm-generic/hardirq.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091217081916.GA11850@lst.de>
Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:19:16 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: convert to asm-generic/hardirq.h

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 05:15:54PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:10:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:18:28PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:55:29PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > > > 
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > 
> > Did this cause problems in the end?  Still doesn't seem to be in Linus'
> > tree.
> 
> Nope, it was in Linus' tree for awhile, but then I needed to add an
> nmi_count and had to switch back to an arch-specific one.

Is there a good reason to overload the irq_cpustat with that?  It seems
like a quite horrible way to duplicate per-cpu data in a less efficient
way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/