[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091217084912.GB1901@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:49:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Teach might_sleep() about preemptible RCU
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:23:57PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:21:05PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > From: tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> >
> > Crap... I think I'm really becoming this cyborg...
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Although I've happily put Paul's Reviewed-by tag in this v2,
> > I'd feel more comfortable if he could confirm it :)
>
> Given that I missed the TINY_RCU problem, I am not sure how much my
> Reviewed-by tag is worth, but I have no problem attaching it to this updated
> patch. ;-)
Reviewed-by is valuable in terms of you both acking the patch and expressing
that you thought it through and like it. It does not mean you have done a
mental kernel build test of all 2^3000 kernel .config variants and have proven
the patch correct under circumstances! :-)
So yes, i've added it - thanks Paul!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists