[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:32 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, acme@...stprotocols.net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events
Commit-ID: 5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:16:32 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:21:36 +0100
perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events
Acme noticed that his FORK/MMAP numbers were inflated by about
the same factor as his cpu-count.
This led to the discovery of a few more sites that need to
respect the event->cpu filter.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091217121830.215333434@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 8ab8698..03cc061 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1381,6 +1381,9 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
continue;
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ continue;
+
hwc = &event->hw;
interrupts = hwc->interrupts;
@@ -3265,6 +3268,9 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap || event->attr.task)
return 1;
@@ -3290,12 +3296,11 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct perf_task_event *task_event)
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
if (!ctx)
ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_task_ctx(ctx, task_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3372,6 +3377,9 @@ static void perf_event_comm_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm)
return 1;
@@ -3408,15 +3416,10 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct perf_comm_event *comm_event)
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
- /*
- * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
- * events ends up in.
- */
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_comm_ctx(ctx, comm_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3491,6 +3494,9 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_output(struct perf_event *event,
static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.mmap)
return 1;
@@ -3564,15 +3570,10 @@ got_name:
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
- /*
- * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
- * events ends up in.
- */
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_mmap_ctx(ctx, mmap_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
kfree(buf);
@@ -3863,6 +3864,9 @@ static int perf_swevent_match(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (!perf_swevent_is_counting(event))
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists