[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912171703.02902.roger.oksanen@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:03:02 +0200
From: Roger Oksanen <roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Roger Oksanen <roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [50/90] e100: Use pci pool to work around GFP_ATOMIC order 5 memory allocation failure
On Thursday 17 December 2009 03:15:01 Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
This commit has a problem, found in
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0912.1/03887.html
and while a fix is available at
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0912.2/01012.html
it should probably be merged into this patch when pushing it to 31.x?
Obviously the fix should first be reviewed and pushed to Linus' tree...
> ------------------
>
>
> From: Roger Oksanen <roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi>
>
> [ Upstream commit 98468efddb101f8a29af974101c17ba513b07be1 ]
>
> pci_alloc_consistent uses GFP_ATOMIC allocation that may fail on some systems
> with limited memory (Bug #14265). pci_pool_alloc allows waiting with
> GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Tested-by: Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Oksanen <roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/e100.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/net/e100.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e100.c
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/dmapool.h>
> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> #include <linux/mii.h>
> @@ -601,6 +602,7 @@ struct nic {
> struct mem *mem;
> dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>
> + struct pci_pool *cbs_pool;
> dma_addr_t cbs_dma_addr;
> u8 adaptive_ifs;
> u8 tx_threshold;
> @@ -1779,9 +1781,7 @@ static void e100_clean_cbs(struct nic *n
> nic->cb_to_clean = nic->cb_to_clean->next;
> nic->cbs_avail++;
> }
> - pci_free_consistent(nic->pdev,
> - sizeof(struct cb) * nic->params.cbs.count,
> - nic->cbs, nic->cbs_dma_addr);
> + pci_pool_free(nic->cbs_pool, nic->cbs, nic->cbs_dma_addr);
> nic->cbs = NULL;
> nic->cbs_avail = 0;
> }
> @@ -1799,8 +1799,8 @@ static int e100_alloc_cbs(struct nic *ni
> nic->cb_to_use = nic->cb_to_send = nic->cb_to_clean = NULL;
> nic->cbs_avail = 0;
>
> - nic->cbs = pci_alloc_consistent(nic->pdev,
> - sizeof(struct cb) * count, &nic->cbs_dma_addr);
> + nic->cbs = pci_pool_alloc(nic->cbs_pool, GFP_KERNEL,
> + &nic->cbs_dma_addr);
> if (!nic->cbs)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -2827,7 +2827,11 @@ static int __devinit e100_probe(struct p
> DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Cannot register net device, aborting.\n");
> goto err_out_free;
> }
> -
> + nic->cbs_pool = pci_pool_create(netdev->name,
> + nic->pdev,
> + nic->params.cbs.count * sizeof(struct cb),
> + sizeof(u32),
> + 0);
> DPRINTK(PROBE, INFO, "addr 0x%llx, irq %d, MAC addr %pM\n",
> (unsigned long long)pci_resource_start(pdev, use_io ? 1 : 0),
> pdev->irq, netdev->dev_addr);
> @@ -2857,6 +2861,7 @@ static void __devexit e100_remove(struct
> unregister_netdev(netdev);
> e100_free(nic);
> pci_iounmap(pdev, nic->csr);
> + pci_pool_destroy(nic->cbs_pool);
> free_netdev(netdev);
> pci_release_regions(pdev);
> pci_disable_device(pdev);
>
>
>
--
Roger Oksanen <roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi>
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/raoksane
+358 50 355 1990
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists