[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091217214320.GG18217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:43:20 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs pile 2
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:22:12PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > reflog had been pruned already; still no effect. Moreover, after looking
> > through the loose objects, I've found several commits that are definitely
> > reachable from master and now from your tree as well. E.g.
> > objects/ea/ff8079d4f1016a12e34ab323737314f24127dd
> > is one of those - it's a commit and it's both in mainline *and* happens
> > to be tip of master. No questions about being unreachable and AFAICS
> > no reasons whatsoever to leave it as a loose object...
>
> If you want a maximal pack, use "git repack -Adl"
Still leaves the same bunch.
> The default gc thing will stop when it hits stuff that has been packed
> already, which can leave _older_ unpacked objects unpacked. And since my
> own repo isn't always fully packed, and git will only remove local objects
> if they are available as _packed_ objects in the reference tree (ie my
> repo), you'll end up with that kind of situation.
Yeah, but why aren't they put into local pack? They _are_ new and they
definitely are referenced. The newest in the repository, as the matter
of fact.
Odd...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists