[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <876384uwvm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:26:05 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: spinlock which can morph into a mutex
Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl> writes:
>
> So I probably need a mutex instead of a spinlock, but I want to
> keep minimal overhead for the common case (when no resizing is in
> progress). I think I need a spinlock that can morph into a mutex ..
The standed mutexes already do that by themselves.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists