[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B2BACD3.7010903@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:24:51 -0600
From: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v5] CPU probe/release files
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> Index: powerpc/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> ===================================================================
>> --- powerpc.orig/arch/powerpc/Kconfig 2009-10-28 15:21:47.000000000 -0500
>> +++ powerpc/arch/powerpc/Kconfig 2009-10-28 15:21:53.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -320,6 +320,10 @@
>>
>> Say N if you are unsure.
>>
>> +config ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
>> + def_bool y
>> + depends on HOTPLUG_CPU
>> +
>
> That does not work.
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `.store_online':
> cpu.c:(.ref.text+0xf5c): undefined reference to `.cpu_hotplug_driver_lock'
> cpu.c:(.ref.text+0xfc8): undefined reference to `.cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock'
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> cpu_hotplug_driver_lock is only defined on pseries, but HOTPLUG_CPU is
> also defined on pmac.
These two routines should be defined as a no-op if CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
is not defined in linux/cpu.h. The update below should be in the patch set
you are looking at.
from linux/cpu.h:
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
extern void cpu_hotplug_driver_lock(void);
extern void cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock(void);
#else
static inline void cpu_hotplug_driver_lock(void)
{
}
static inline void cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock(void)
{
}
#endif
-Nathan Fontenot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists