[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091218011128.GA29552@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:11:28 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] ptrace_signal: check PT_PTRACED before reporting a
signal
No functional changes, preparation for utrace-ptrace.
Change ptrace_signal() to check PT_PTRACED instead of task_ptrace() != 0.
Currently this is the same, PT_PTRACED must be always set if the task is
ptraced.
This change is needed to make sure ptrace_signal() does nothing if ptrace
is implemented on top of utrace, eventually this code will be removed
completely.
Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- V1/kernel/signal.c~3_PTRACE_SIGNAL_CK_PTRACED 2009-12-18 00:20:50.000000000 +0100
+++ V1/kernel/signal.c 2009-12-18 00:48:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
static int ptrace_signal(int signr, siginfo_t *info,
struct pt_regs *regs, void *cookie)
{
- if (!task_ptrace(current))
+ if (!(task_ptrace(current) & PT_PTRACED))
return signr;
ptrace_signal_deliver(regs, cookie);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists