[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1261174166.13019.20.camel@wall-e>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:09:26 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Walls <awalls@...ix.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [patch] media video cx23888 driver: ported to new kfifo
API]
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 14:00 -0800 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:57:22 +0100
> Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net> wrote:
>
> > But kfifo_len() did not
> > requiere a lock in my opinion. It is save to use without a look.
>
> What do you mean by this? Safe in general, or safe in this particular driver?
>
Safe until you don't call kfifo_reset(). kfifo_reset() is evil, because
it it the only function which breaks the single read/writer concept.
This function modifies the in and the out fifo counters. Thats why i
introduced the kfifo_reset_out() function, which set the out to the
value of in, which means the fifo is empty. This function can be call
from the receiver of a fifo without locking.
Stefani
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists