[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091218223230.GA1853@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:32:30 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
utrace-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: x86: do_debug && PTRACE_SINGLESTEP broken by
08d68323d1f0c34452e614263b212ca556dae47f
On 12/18, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > Please find the trivial test-case below. It hangs, because
> > PTRACE_SINGLESTEP doesn't trigger the trap.
>
> 2.6.33-rc1 x86-64 works for me with either -m64 or -m32 version of that test.
>
> > (not sure this matters, but I did the testing under kvm)
>
> Apparently it does. You should hack some printks into do_debug() and see
> how kvm is differing from real hardware. (Actually you can probably do
> this with a notifier added by a module, not that you are shy about
> recompiling!)
>
> Probably kvm's emulation of the hardware behavior wrt the DR6 bits is not
> sufficiently faithful. Conceivably, kvm is being consistent with some
> older hardware and we have encoded assumptions that only newer hardware
> meets. But I'd guess it's just a plain kvm bug.
OK, thanks.
Hmm. Now I see how wrong I was when I said this code is "obviously wrong" ;)
I'll add the debugging printk's and report the output. Sorry for delay,
can't do this today.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists