[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091219201816.GA28742@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:18:17 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Alberto Panizzo <maramaopercheseimorto@...il.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Sascha linux-arm <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-infradead <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: mc13783: When probing, unlock the mc13783
before subsystems initialisation.
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:12:26PM +0100, Alberto Panizzo wrote:
> Ping :)
>
> PATCH 1 & 2 are fixes that can go to .33
I don't like patch 1. I'd prefer that drivers touching
MC13783_REG_POWER_MISCELLANEOUS are aware of the bit in question and
wouldn't rely on mc13783-core.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists