[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091218.203209.229747361.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:32:09 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wg@...ndegger.com
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dvrabel@...om.com, gregkh@...e.de, urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de,
oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de, kurt.van.dijck@....be,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] can/at91: don't check platform_get_irq's return
value against zero
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:58:38 +0100
> Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> platform_get_irq returns -ENXIO on failure, so !irq was probably
>> always true. Better use (int)irq <= 0. Note that a return value of
>> zero is still handled as error even though this could mean irq0.
>>
>> This is a followup to 305b3228f9ff4d59f49e6d34a7034d44ee8ce2f0 that
>> changed the return value of platform_get_irq from 0 to -ENXIO on error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists