[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14397.1261200797@localhost>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:33:17 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph distributed file system client for 2.6.33
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:54:02 PST, Sage Weil said:
> I would still like to see ceph merged for 2.6.33. It's certainly not
> production ready, but it would be greatly beneficial to be in mainline for
> the same reasons other file systems like btrfs and exofs were merged
> early.
Is the on-the-wire protocol believed to be correct, complete, and stable? How
about any userspace APIs and on-disk formats? In other words..
> > The git tree includes the full patchset posted in October and incremental
> > changes since then. I've tried to cram in all the anticipated protocol
> > changes, but the file system is still strictly EXPERIMENTAL and is marked
Anything left dangling on the changes?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists