[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7vk4wjrf12.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:19:53 -0800
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
To: Daniel Poelzleithner <poelzi@...lzi.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: xtime as new inode attribute
Daniel Poelzleithner <poelzi@...lzi.org> writes:
> I would like to suggest a new attribute for inodes in linux filesystems
> to record the last execution time of files.
>
> The problem:
>
> If a linux installation gets older and older, more and more programs get
> installed over time. Mostly to just test them for a particular problem
> and often the deinstallation is forgotten. To find out which packages
> are not used for a long time is currently quite impossible. The user may
> use program X which will run but not depend on program Y as a subprocess
> for example.
>
> The solution:
>
> I suggest a new inode attribute called xtime, which is like atime, but
> will only be updated when a file is executed. This would allow tracking
> of unused binaries and could be used with some clever algorithms in the
> cleanup program to find unused packages for removal or other cleanup
> purposes.
As I've never seen "cat /bin/sh" or similar done on an executable binary
by sane people, and I imagine that most sane back-up programs wouldn't
touch atime, I suspect that what you want to do can be done by checking
atime instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists