| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091220191929.4274.88803.stgit@bob.kio>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:19:29 -0700
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] ACPI: processor: finish unifying
arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc()
The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get
set in the input obj_list buffer.
There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those
bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer,
we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire
struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 4 ++++
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c | 18 ------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c | 34 ----------------------------------
drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 6 +++---
include/acpi/processor.h | 1 -
6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 3b78882..7ae5889 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
#endif
static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
+static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+}
#define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
index ebe23f5..7ba5acc 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
@@ -14,24 +14,6 @@
#include <acpi/processor.h>
#include <asm/acpi.h>
-static void init_intel_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
- u32 *buf = (u32 *)pr->pdc->pointer->buffer.pointer;
-
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-
- return;
-}
-
-/* Initialize _PDC data based on the CPU vendor */
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
- init_intel_pdc(pr);
- return;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc);
-
void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
if (pr->pdc) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index d787e6e..56f462c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -149,6 +149,25 @@ static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
}
+static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
+
+ /*
+ * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
+ */
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
+ buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
#define acpi_lapic 0
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
index d722ca8..0f57307 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
@@ -12,40 +12,6 @@
#include <acpi/processor.h>
#include <asm/acpi.h>
-static void init_intel_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
- u32 *buf = (u32 *)pr->pdc->pointer->buffer.pointer;
-
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
-
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
-
- /*
- * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
- */
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
- buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
-
- return;
-}
-
-
-/* Initialize _PDC data based on the CPU vendor */
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(pr->id);
-
- init_intel_pdc(pr, c);
-
- return;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc);
-
void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
if (pr->pdc) {
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
index ccda7c9..48df08e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ static void acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
/* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
buf[2] = ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
+
+ /* Twiddle arch-specific bits needed for _PDC */
+ arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(buf);
}
static void acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
@@ -81,9 +84,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
obj_list->pointer = obj;
pr->pdc = obj_list;
- /* Now let the arch do the bit-twiddling to buf[] */
- arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(pr);
-
return;
}
diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index a1b748a..50edd73 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module);
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors);
extern struct acpi_processor_errata errata;
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
#ifdef ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists