linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/11] ACPI: processor: introduce arch_has_acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091220191914.4274.81028.stgit@bob.kio>
Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:19:14 -0700
From:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To:	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org
Cc:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] ACPI: processor: introduce arch_has_acpi_pdc

arch dependent helper function that tells us if we should attempt to
evaluate _PDC on this machine or not.

The x86 implementation assumes that the CPUs in the machine must be
homogeneous, and that you cannot mix CPUs of different vendors.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
---

 arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h     |    2 ++
 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h      |    7 +++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c |    4 +---
 drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c     |    3 +++
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 91df968..3b78882 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ extern int __devinitdata pxm_to_nid_map[MAX_PXM_DOMAINS];
 extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
 #endif
 
+static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
+
 #define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index 60d2b2d..d787e6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ static inline unsigned int acpi_processor_cstate_check(unsigned int max_cstate)
 		return max_cstate;
 }
 
+static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
+{
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+	return (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
+		c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
+}
+
 #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
 
 #define acpi_lapic 0
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
index d85d1b2..bcb6efe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
@@ -79,9 +79,7 @@ void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(pr->id);
 
 	pr->pdc = NULL;
-	if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL ||
-	    c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR)
-		init_intel_pdc(pr, c);
+	init_intel_pdc(pr, c);
 
 	return;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
index b416c32..931e735 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_eval_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 
 void acpi_processor_set_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 {
+	if (arch_has_acpi_pdc() == false)
+		return;
+
 	arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(pr);
 	acpi_processor_eval_pdc(pr);
 	arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(pr);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/