linux-kernel - Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200912200422.18314.andres@anarazel.de>
Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:22:17 +0100
From:	Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
To:	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	"Jason Garrett-Glaser" <darkshikari@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS

On Saturday 19 December 2009 18:36:03 Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> Try this on a dualcore or quadcore system, or ofcourse just set the<
> niceness accordingly...
Oh well. This is getting too much for a normally very silent and flame fearing 
reader. Didnt *you* just tell others to shut up about using any tunables for 
any application? And that you dont need any tunables for BFS?

Andres
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/