lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:22:17 +0100 From: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de> To: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>, "Jason Garrett-Glaser" <darkshikari@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, LKML Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS On Saturday 19 December 2009 18:36:03 Kasper Sandberg wrote: > Try this on a dualcore or quadcore system, or ofcourse just set the< > niceness accordingly... Oh well. This is getting too much for a normally very silent and flame fearing reader. Didnt *you* just tell others to shut up about using any tunables for any application? And that you dont need any tunables for BFS? Andres -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists