[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091220193114.5545.71356.stgit@bob.kio>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:31:14 -0700
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/11] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc()
interface
When calling _PDC, we really only need the handle to the processor
to call the method; we don't look at any other parts of the
struct acpi_processor * given to us.
In the early path, when we walk the namespace, we are given the
handle directly, so just pass it through to acpi_processor_set_pdc()
without stuffing it into a wasteful struct acpi_processor allocated
on the stack each time
This saves 2834 bytes of stack.
Update the interface accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 18 +++---------------
include/acpi/processor.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index a19a4ff..9863c98 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device)
}
/* _PDC call should be done before doing anything else (if reqd.). */
- acpi_processor_set_pdc(pr);
+ acpi_processor_set_pdc(pr->handle);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(pr, 0);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
index deeba22..30e4dc0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ acpi_processor_eval_pdc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_object_list *pdc_in)
return status;
}
-void acpi_processor_set_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+void acpi_processor_set_pdc(acpi_handle handle)
{
struct acpi_object_list *obj_list;
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ void acpi_processor_set_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
if (!obj_list)
return;
- acpi_processor_eval_pdc(pr->handle, obj_list);
+ acpi_processor_eval_pdc(handle, obj_list);
kfree(obj_list->pointer->buffer.pointer);
kfree(obj_list->pointer);
@@ -147,19 +147,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_set_pdc);
static acpi_status
early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
{
- struct acpi_processor pr;
-
- pr.handle = handle;
-
- /* x86 implementation looks at pr.id to determine some
- * CPU capabilites. We can just hard code to 0 since we're
- * assuming the CPUs in the system are homogenous and all
- * have the same capabilities.
- */
- pr.id = 0;
-
- acpi_processor_set_pdc(&pr);
-
+ acpi_processor_set_pdc(handle);
return AE_OK;
}
diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index 0873cd5..7cc433d 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit)
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
/* in processor_pdc.c */
-void acpi_processor_set_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
+void acpi_processor_set_pdc(acpi_handle handle);
/* in processor_throttling.c */
int acpi_processor_tstate_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists