[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B2DEA33.7000800@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:11:15 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V8 03/16] Use this_cpu operations in slub
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Using per cpu allocations removes the needs for the per cpu arrays in the
> kmem_cache struct. These could get quite big if we have to support systems
> with thousands of cpus. The use of this_cpu_xx operations results in:
>
> 1. The size of kmem_cache for SMP configuration shrinks since we will only
> need 1 pointer instead of NR_CPUS. The same pointer can be used by all
> processors. Reduces cache footprint of the allocator.
>
> 2. We can dynamically size kmem_cache according to the actual nodes in the
> system meaning less memory overhead for configurations that may potentially
> support up to 1k NUMA nodes / 4k cpus.
>
> 3. We can remove the diddle widdle with allocating and releasing of
> kmem_cache_cpu structures when bringing up and shutting down cpus. The cpu
> alloc logic will do it all for us. Removes some portions of the cpu hotplug
> functionality.
>
> 4. Fastpath performance increases since per cpu pointer lookups and
> address calculations are avoided.
>
> V7-V8
> - Convert missed get_cpu_slab() under CONFIG_SLUB_STATS
>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Patches 3-6 applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists