[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091221134837.GB12670@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:18:37 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] implement utrace-ptrace
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:11:40AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> The patch adds the new file, kernel/ptrace-utrace.c, which contains
> the new implementation of ptrace over utrace.
>
> This file is not compiled until we have CONFIG_UTRACE option, will be
> added by the next "utrace core" patch.
>
> It's supposed to be an invisible implementation change, nothing should
> change to userland when CONFIG_UTRACE is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
Oleg,
ptrace/utrace performs better with the ptrace-tests [1] testsuite (1 failure
vs. 3 with vanilla ptrace [1]). The gdb testsuite also has no
regressions. In fact, the results on the gdb testsuite are identical.
Ananth
[1] http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/utrace/tests
[2] detach-stopped and stopped-attach-transparency are the additional
failures. syscall-reset fails in both cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists