[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0912210621g19535a03q38b8b67c01df6a75@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:21:03 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: pata_bf54x: handle portmuxing of pins through
GPIO PORTs
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 14:07, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> By default, the PATA pins are routed to the async address lines in which
>> case, no peripheral muxing needs to be done. However, if the pins get
>> routed through the GPIO PORTs pins, we need to make sure to request them
>> so that the muxing is properly set up.
>> ---
>> Andrew: could you pick this up ? it was posted over a month ago to the
>> Linux/IDE list w/no feedback.
>
> Although it is disappointing that your patch was missed -- our apologies --
> I don't think the best response was to elide linux-ide and the libata
> maintainer, in favor of a higher noise list. :)
>
> I have the patch queued, now.
so it's been 8 months since it was posted, 6 months since it was
queued, and multiple libata merges have been made, but this patch has
yet to make it into mainline ...
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists