linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B2FD4CC.5070609@crca.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:04:28 +1100
From:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results

Hi.

Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:25 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: 
>> Hi.
>>
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what the next step should be at this point.  To me, the picture is
>>> quite clear now, but perhaps we ought to run more tests on some other machines
>>> or something.  Please let me know what you think.
>> Looks great. If you do decide you want other machines tested, I'll
>> happily try the machines around here:
>>
>> - Dell M1530
>> - Omnibook XE3-GF.
>> - Via LN10000 based Mythtv Box
>> - Desktop machine - Some Intel-based mobo I've forgotten the name of.
>>
>> I've been quietly following the thread, but have lost track of what
>> iteration of the patch you're on, so if you'd give me a pointer to it,
>> I'd be grateful.
>>
>> By the way, I haven't forgotten about sending some real patches for
>> swsusp (ie more than just cleanups). I'm just busy with other things and
>> also thinking carefully about what order to do things in.
> 
> I vote for ability to save all ram to the disk.
> After several days of testing I managed to make my system do s2disk
> really reliable (~300 cycles tested), but suspending when memory is
> tight still fails sometimes.
> 
> I didn't yet use your tuxonice system  though.

Well, I want to and intend on working towards merging as much of
TuxOnIce as people will allow in, but it will take a long time because
there are so many modifications to do, I don't have that much time to
work on it, am splitting the time I do have and am still have a couple
of new features I want to do to TuxOnIce.

Regards,

Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/