[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0912211551580.2643-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:54:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Do you think it's a good idea to mark all SCSI devices as async? Well, for
> testing it probably is, but I doubt in general.
That would be a good question to post on Linux-SCSI.
In most respects it's probably okay. But some people with large disk
farms might not like it if their drives should suddenly start to spin
up (with a correspondingly large power draw) all at the same time.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists