[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1261359292.10432.97.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:34:52 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] ACPI: processor: call _PDC early
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 03:30 +0800, Alex Chiang wrote:
> We discovered that at least one machine (HP Envy), methods in the DSDT
> attempt to call external methods defined in a dynamically loaded SSDT.
>
> Unfortunately, the DSDT methods we are trying to call are part of the
> EC initialization, which happens very early, and the the dynamic SSDT
> is only loaded when a processor _PDC method runs much later.
>
> This results in namespace lookup errors for the (as of yet) undefined
> methods.
>
> Since Windows doesn't have any issues with this machine, we take it
> as a hint that they must be evaluating _PDC much earlier than we are.
>
> Thus, the proper thing for Linux to do should be to match the Windows
> implementation more closely.
>
> Provide a mechanism to call _PDC before we enable the EC. Doing so loads
> the dynamic tables, and allows the EC to be enabled correctly.
>
> The ACPI processor driver will still evaluate _PDC in its .add() method
> to cover the hotplug case.
>
> Resolves: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824
>
> Cc: ming.m.lin@...el.com
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
> ---
>
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1
> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 2 +
> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 69 --------------------------
> drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/acpi/processor.h | 3 +
> 6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> index c7b10b4..66cc3f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += proc.o
> #
> acpi-y += bus.o glue.o
> acpi-y += scan.o
> +acpi-y += processor_pdc.o
> acpi-y += ec.o
> acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK) += dock.o
> acpi-y += pci_root.o pci_link.o pci_irq.o pci_bind.o
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> index 65f7e33..0bdf24a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@ static int __init acpi_bus_init(void)
> goto error1;
> }
>
> + acpi_early_processor_set_pdc();
acpi_bus_init(...) {
acpi_ec_ecdt_probe();
acpi_initialize_objects(ACPI_FULL_INITIALIZATION);
acpi_early_processor_set_pdc();
acpi_boot_ec_enable();
}
EC space handler may be installed in acpi_ec_ecdt_probe or
acpi_boot_ec_enable.
In your machine(HP Envy), EC space handler is installed in
acpi_boot_ec_enable.
It seems that this patch does not fix the problem if EC space hanlder is
installed in acpi_ec_ecdt_probe, right?
But clearly, we can not put acpi_early_processor_set_pdc before
acpi_ec_ecdt_probe because ACPI namespace objects have not been
initialized yet at that time.
Looks like a "chicken or the egg" problem.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
Lin Ming
> +
> /*
> * Maybe EC region is required at bus_scan/acpi_get_devices. So it
> * is necessary to enable it as early as possible.
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index 074cf86..cb28e05 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ int acpi_power_transition(struct acpi_device *device, int state);
> extern int acpi_power_nocheck;
>
> int acpi_wakeup_device_init(void);
> +void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void);
>
> /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Embedded Controller
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index 4173123..a19a4ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -124,29 +124,6 @@ static const struct file_operations acpi_processor_info_fops = {
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors);
> struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly;
> -static int set_no_mwait(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
> -{
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE PREFIX "%s detected - "
> - "disabling mwait for CPU C-states\n", id->ident);
> - idle_nomwait = 1;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct dmi_system_id __cpuinitdata processor_idle_dmi_table[] = {
> - {
> - set_no_mwait, "IFL91 board", {
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "COMPAL"),
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ZEPTO"),
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "3215W"),
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "IFL91") }, NULL},
> - {
> - set_no_mwait, "Extensa 5220", {
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "Phoenix Technologies LTD"),
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Acer"),
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "0100"),
> - DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Columbia") }, NULL},
> - {},
> -};
>
> /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Errata Handling
> @@ -277,45 +254,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_errata(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> }
>
> /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Common ACPI processor functions
> - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> -
> -/*
> - * _PDC is required for a BIOS-OS handshake for most of the newer
> - * ACPI processor features.
> - */
> -static int acpi_processor_set_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> -{
> - struct acpi_object_list *pdc_in = pr->pdc;
> - acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> -
> -
> - if (!pdc_in)
> - return status;
> - if (idle_nomwait) {
> - /*
> - * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> - * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> - * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> - */
> - union acpi_object *obj;
> - u32 *buffer = NULL;
> -
> - obj = pdc_in->pointer;
> - buffer = (u32 *)(obj->buffer.pointer);
> - buffer[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> -
> - }
> - status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PDC", pdc_in, NULL);
> -
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> - ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> - "Could not evaluate _PDC, using legacy perf. control...\n"));
> -
> - return status;
> -}
> -
> -/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> FS Interface (/proc)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
>
> @@ -825,9 +763,7 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> }
>
> /* _PDC call should be done before doing anything else (if reqd.). */
> - arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(pr);
> acpi_processor_set_pdc(pr);
> - arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(pr);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(pr, 0);
> @@ -1145,11 +1081,6 @@ static int __init acpi_processor_init(void)
> if (!acpi_processor_dir)
> return -ENOMEM;
> #endif
> - /*
> - * Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM
> - * should not use mwait for CPU-states.
> - */
> - dmi_check_system(processor_idle_dmi_table);
> result = cpuidle_register_driver(&acpi_idle_driver);
> if (result < 0)
> goto out_proc;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b416c32
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
> +
> +#include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> +#define PREFIX "ACPI: "
> +#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT
> +ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_pdc");
> +
> +static int set_no_mwait(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
> +{
> + printk(KERN_NOTICE PREFIX "%s detected - "
> + "disabling mwait for CPU C-states\n", id->ident);
> + idle_nomwait = 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct dmi_system_id __cpuinitdata processor_idle_dmi_table[] = {
> + {
> + set_no_mwait, "IFL91 board", {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "COMPAL"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ZEPTO"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "3215W"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "IFL91") }, NULL},
> + {
> + set_no_mwait, "Extensa 5220", {
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "Phoenix Technologies LTD"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Acer"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "0100"),
> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Columbia") }, NULL},
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * _PDC is required for a BIOS-OS handshake for most of the newer
> + * ACPI processor features.
> + */
> +static int acpi_processor_eval_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +{
> + struct acpi_object_list *pdc_in = pr->pdc;
> + acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> +
> + if (!pdc_in)
> + return status;
> + if (idle_nomwait) {
> + /*
> + * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> + * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> + * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> + */
> + union acpi_object *obj;
> + u32 *buffer = NULL;
> +
> + obj = pdc_in->pointer;
> + buffer = (u32 *)(obj->buffer.pointer);
> + buffer[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> +
> + }
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PDC", pdc_in, NULL);
> +
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> + "Could not evaluate _PDC, using legacy perf. control.\n"));
> +
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +void acpi_processor_set_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +{
> + arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(pr);
> + acpi_processor_eval_pdc(pr);
> + arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(pr);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_set_pdc);
> +
> +static acpi_status
> +early_init_pdc(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> +{
> + struct acpi_processor pr;
> +
> + pr.handle = handle;
> +
> + /* x86 implementation looks at pr.id to determine some
> + * CPU capabilites. We can just hard code to 0 since we're
> + * assuming the CPUs in the system are homogenous and all
> + * have the same capabilities.
> + */
> + pr.id = 0;
> +
> + acpi_processor_set_pdc(&pr);
> +
> + return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM
> + * should not use mwait for CPU-states.
> + */
> + dmi_check_system(processor_idle_dmi_table);
> +
> + acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
> + ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
> + early_init_pdc, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> index 29245c6..a1b748a 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -325,6 +325,9 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
>
> +/* in processor_pdc.c */
> +void acpi_processor_set_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
> +
> /* in processor_throttling.c */
> int acpi_processor_tstate_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr);
> int acpi_processor_get_throttling_info(struct acpi_processor *pr);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists