[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1eimpm6hs.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:59:59 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/11] SYSCTL: Use RCU to avoid races with string sysctls
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> writes:
> With BKL-less sysctls most of the writable string sysctls are racy. There
> is no locking on the reader side, so a reader could see an inconsistent
> string or worse miss the terminating null and walk of beyond it.
The walk will only extend up to the maximum length of the string.
So the worst case really is inconsistent data.
This is an unfortunate corner case. This is not a regression as this
has been the way things have worked for years. So probably 2.6.34
material.
> This patch kit adds a new "rcu string" variant to avoid these
> problems and convers the racy users. One the writer side the strings are
> always copied to new memory and the readers use rcu_read_lock()
> to get a stable view. For readers who access the string over
> sleeps the reader copies the string.
I will have to look more after the holidays. This rcu_string looks like
it introduces allocations on paths that did not use them before, which
has me wondering a bit.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists