[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B2F22EF.6040500@crca.org.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:25:35 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'm not sure what the next step should be at this point. To me, the picture is
> quite clear now, but perhaps we ought to run more tests on some other machines
> or something. Please let me know what you think.
Looks great. If you do decide you want other machines tested, I'll
happily try the machines around here:
- Dell M1530
- Omnibook XE3-GF.
- Via LN10000 based Mythtv Box
- Desktop machine - Some Intel-based mobo I've forgotten the name of.
I've been quietly following the thread, but have lost track of what
iteration of the patch you're on, so if you'd give me a pointer to it,
I'd be grateful.
By the way, I haven't forgotten about sending some real patches for
swsusp (ie more than just cleanups). I'm just busy with other things and
also thinking carefully about what order to do things in.
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists