[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091222120803.GR18217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:08:03 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Liuwenyi <qingshenlwy@...il.com>
Cc: chris.mason@...cle.com, joel.becker@...cle.com, cjb@...top.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, onlyflyer@...il.com,
strongzgy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 02/12]posix_acl: Add the check items
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:52:58PM +0800, Liuwenyi wrote:
> @@ -102,12 +102,9 @@ static int btrfs_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle
> *trans,
> char *value = NULL;
> mode_t mode;
>
> - if (acl) {
> - ret = posix_acl_valid(acl);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - ret = 0;
> - }
> + ret = posix_acl_valid(acl);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
... and now you can't remove acl from btrfs inode. At all.
NAK the entire series. You are changing existing user-visible behaviour
for all filesystems for no reason and at least in this case it's clearly
wrong change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists