[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091222123440.GB19056@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:34:40 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Vrabel <dvrabel@...om.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@...esas.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ASoC: sh: FSI:: don't check platform_get_irq's
return value against zero
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:10:09PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> platform_get_irq returns -ENXIO on failure, so !irq was probably
> always true. Better use (int)irq <= 0. Note that a return value of
> zero is still handled as error even though this could mean irq0.
>
> This is a followup to 305b3228f9ff4d59f49e6d34a7034d44ee8ce2f0 that
> changed the return value of platform_get_irq from 0 to -ENXIO on error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists