[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1261492882.4937.34.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:41:22 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, efault@....de
Subject: [PATCH] sched:
As demonstrated by Eric, we really need to call __set_task_cpu() early
in the fork() path to properly initialize the various task state --
specifically the cgroup state through set_task_rq().
[ we could probably fix this by explicitly calling __set_task_cpu() from
sched_fork(), but lets try that for the next cycle and simply revert
to the old behaviour for now. ]
Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2067,11 +2067,10 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p,
trace_sched_migrate_task(p, new_cpu);
- if (task_cpu(p) == new_cpu)
- return;
-
- p->se.nr_migrations++;
- perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
+ if (task_cpu(p) != new_cpu) {
+ p->se.nr_migrations++;
+ perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, 1, NULL, 0);
+ }
__set_task_cpu(p, new_cpu);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists