[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0912221607180.21496@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:10:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Am?rico Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Example picked totally at random:
> >
> > set_le_ih_k_offset(ih,
> > le_ih_k_offset(ih) +
> > (tb->
> > lbytes <<
> > (is_indirect_le_ih
> > (ih) ? tb->tb_sb->
> > s_blocksize_bits -
> > UNFM_P_SHIFT :
> > 0)));
> >
> > See how everything is nicely aligned to 80 cols?
> >
> >
> > Generally, don't look at this function after having a good lunch you want
> > to keep. You have been warned.
> >
> This isn't a valid example, as it wasn't written by a human. This is the
> result of Lindent being run blindly on the file and nothing more.
>
> Try again.
But having hard rule imposed on everyone to stick with 80-char rule makes
people to do exactly this kind of things (blindly running indent -l80 and
believing that it makes the code more readable because it is
CodingStyle-compliant(tm)).
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists