[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091222153955.GD3308@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:39:56 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dynamic debug - adding ring buffer storage support
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:32:06PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I use dynamic debug sometimes, I thought it could be useful having
> the possibility to store the output somewhere else than dmesg.
>
> The attached patch implements support for storing dynamic debug
> messages to the ring buffer.
>
> The dynamic debug allows simple addition of new flags,
> so I added 'r' flag for ring buffer storage.
>
> I used the ring buffer implementation from trace framework.
>
> hopefuly this could be any use for others as well...
> plz let me know what you think,
>
> jirka
>
hi,
I like the idea of using the ring buffer for output. However, I'm not
sure why we need a separate one for this. I like adding the 'r' for ring
buffer storage, by why not just make this path call 'trace_printk()', and
store the string in the existing kernel tracing ring buffer? That way it
can interleave with other trace data as well.
thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists