linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.32: x86_32: Destination address is too large.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B31154C.2010204@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:51:56 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32: x86_32: Destination address is too large.

On 12/17/2009 05:36 AM, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> 
> heap is 0x31341b80 here,
> CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xC0000000
> 
> gcc version 4.4.0 20090514 (Red Hat 4.4.0-6.314103)
> 
> 2.6.27 works fine.

The combination of an ancient distro (CentOS/RHEL 4) and a bzip2
compressed kernel makes me feel reasonably certain that this is yet an
instance of "the bloody shell scripts don't actually generate the proper
length field."

It's a known problem and we're working on it.  In the meantime, select
gzip for the kernel compression.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/