[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <354B2877CF17F44BB3FA44EB4DB0E5470C91CE17E0@orsmsx510.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:51:00 -0800
From: "Smith, GeoffX" <geoffx.smith@...el.com>
To: "Smith, GeoffX" <geoffx.smith@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] prctl: return timerslack through pointer
On December 22, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> To: Smith, GeoffX
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Arjan van de Ven; stable@...nel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl: return timerslack through pointer
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:17:15 -0800
> "Smith, GeoffX" <geoffx.smith@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> This patch fixes the semantics of prctl() option PR_GET_TIMERSLACK
>> to pass the return value through *arg2....
>
> If we're going to do this then we should backport the patch into
> 2.6.32.x as well. And I agree that there is time to make this change.
The patch applies cleanly to 2.6.32.2 as well as to the mainline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists